Garthwaite/Doyle/Greater Wisconsin Committee Ads - "Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire" Lies

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and Politifact.com are calling Jim Doyle's Greater Wisconsin Committee attack ads "Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire" lies. Thus far, the shadowy attack group has spent over $200,000 in negative attacks to save their friend, incumbent Phil Garthwaite.



Here is their story:

Group says Wisconsin Republican Assembly candidates want to privatize Social Security
Pants on Fire!
Share this story:

Campaign literature distributed by the Greater Wisconsin committee against a Wisconsin state Assembly candidate (back)

Campaign literature distributed by the Greater Wisconsin committee against a Wisconsin state Assembly candidate (front)

Worried about the future of Social Security? A liberal Wisconsin group is betting you are -- or that it can make you worried before election day.

The Greater Wisconsin Committee and its Greater Wisconsin Political Fund are using mailers and radio ads to target Republican candidates in key 2010 races for the Wisconsin Assembly. Democrats outnumber Republicans there, 56-42.

The central theme of the attacks: The GOP Assembly candidates, like their Washington counterparts, want to privatize Social Security.

Yes, Social Security, that venerable federal program -- one the state Assembly has no control over.

The wording of the attacks varies, but the claims are all similar to this one against Republican Travis Tranel, who is challenging Rep. Phil Garthwaite, D-Dickeyville.

"Travis Tranel," a mail piece says, "sides with those who want to privatize Social Security -- and risk our retirements on Wall Street."

Lest anyone miss the point, the flier includes a man -- presumably a fat-cat Wall Street banker or investor -- lighting his cigar with a Social Security card that’s been set aflame.

There’s also an image of a magnifying glass inviting readers to "check the facts."

Why, thank you. We will.

Asked to elaborate on her organization’s claims, Greater Wisconsin Committee executive director Michelle McGrorty offered two main points:

* In the group’s view, "A Roadmap for America’s Future" -- U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan to tackle the federal debt and deficits, and make significant changes to taxes, Medicare and Social Security -- would privatize Social Security.

* Ryan, a Janesville Republican, has ties to the state GOP Assembly candidates targeted by the group.


At PolitiFact Wisconsin, this is familiar ground.

We gave Pants on Fire ratings to claims that GOP congressional candidates backed privatizing Social Security, when Democrats provided no proof beyond a sliced-and-diced statement and a two-word answer taken out of context.

Now state Assembly candidates? This could get good.

Let’s start with Ryan’s "Roadmap," a plan that has helped put Ryan on the political map, but one that does not have universal support among the GOP leadership in Washington.

PolitiFact National examined the roadmap in August 2010, after President Barack Obama alluded to it in saying GOP leaders are backing privatization plans that would tie Social Security benefits "to the whims of Wall Street traders and the ups and downs of the stock market."

If adopted, Ryan’s plan would enable workers under 55 to, voluntarily, invest a portion of their Social Security taxes in funds managed by the government. As Politifact National noted: "That's a far cry from privatizing the entirety of Social Security."

So, the Greater Wisconsin Committee is starting off on the wrong road with its claim about the roadmap.

As for the ties to Ryan, this is old-fashioned guilt by association ... and there ain’t much association, at least when it comes to the Social Security issue.

* Tranel, a Cuba City dairy farmer, is making his second attempt to unseat Garthwaite, a second-term Assembly Democrat. The mail piece that claims he "sides with those who want to privatize Social Security" says its proof is a newspaper article. In the article, Tranel expresses admiration for Ryan -- but there’s no mention of Social Security.

* Dennis Clinard, a retired U.S. Army master sergeant from Cataract, is seeking to unseat first-term Rep. Mark Radcliffe, D-Black River Falls. A flier says "Washington politicians who wants (sic) to privatize Social Security are the fund-raising muscle behind" Clinard’s campaign. The proof listed in the flier is Ryan’s appearance at a fundraiser for Clinard. It took in $7,250, according to a state GOP official, or about 15 percent of the $46,357 Clinard’s campaign has raised in 2010.

* Howard Marklein, a Wilson Creek accountant, is running for an open seat against Mineral Point Democrat John Simonson, a retired University of Wisconsin-Platteville economics professor. A mail piece says Marklein is "backed by Washington, D.C., politicians who want to privatize Social Security." McGrorty said the proof is a picture of Ryan and Marklein on Marklein’s campaign website.


We could go on.

A GWC radio ad says some tea party candidates want to eliminate Social Security and "we have one right here, this guy Jack Cummings." Cummings, an Endeavor farmer, is challenging first-term Rep. Fred Clark, D-Baraboo. McGrorty’s defense: The ad talks about a number of issues and doesn’t say that Cummings wants to eliminate Social Security.

Hmmm .... "We have one right here."

(Senate Democrat Ted Zigmunt of Francis Creek also uses a flier to accuse his Republican opponent, Andre Jacque, of supporting privatization of Social Security. A campaign aide cited Jacque’s endorsement by the Republican Liberty Caucus, but no statement Jacque has made about Social Security.)

How do the targeted candidates respond to all of this?

Brian Pleva, a spokesman for the Wisconsin Republican Assembly Campaign Committee, said none of them supports -- or has made statements in support of -- privatizing or eliminating Social Security.

Why would they? They’re not running for Congress.

In any case, we could not find any such statements. And the Greater Wisconsin Committee could not provide any.

Indeed, on two of the fliers, one of the check-our-facts citations is a report by the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington. The report predicts cuts in Social Security benefits would result from Ryan’s plan, but that doesn’t address the question of privatization, and the report doesn’t mention the targeted candidates.

If you’re sensing a theme here, so are we.

In targeting Republicans in races that could shift the balance of power in the state Assembly, the Greater Wisconsin Committee is taking a page from the national Democratic playbook -- and misusing it. To play to fears of seniors and others, the group labels a proposal from U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin, as privatizing Social Security.

Even if the plan did privatize Social Security (in our view it does not), the group has offered no evidence that the GOP Assembly candidates back it. The "proof" cited borders on absurd: One candidate praised Ryan, one got his picture taken with him and a third had Ryan appear at his campaign fundraiser. Is that cigar still burning?

If not, we need a light, because the ruling is Pants on Fire.

Wisconsin Democracy Campaign Weighs in on Rep. Garthwaite's "Sugar Daddies"

The left-leaning Wisconsin Democracy Campaign (WDC) issued an interesting report today, just as the public employee unions, trial attorneys, tribes and other leftist groups continue to lavish thousands of dollars worth of misleading radio ads on Rep. Garthwaite through their front group The Greater Wisconsin Committee. The WDC report lays out some interesting findings on the November 2008 election. For instance, the state's teachers union, WEAC spent more than $550,000 to defeat just one Republican candidate in just one seat. Garthwaite benefited from similar spending from The Greater Wisconsin Committee and other far-left groups.

As interesting as the findings in the WDC's report is the colorful language it uses. According to the WDC, the Greater Wisconsin Committee is Rep. Garthwaite's "Sugar Daddy."

Shady Political Attack Group Back and Supporting Garthwaite

The Greater Wisconsin Committee, a group the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign refers to as a Milwaukee based Phony issue ad group is running a phony issue ad on Grant County radio stations. The group's phony ad urges voters to thank Rep. Garthwaite for voting for a budget that protects the middle class. Now anyone who has read anything about this budget knows that it raises dozens of taxes and fees on the middle class and that the Greater Wisconsin Committee ad is well...phony. More interesting than the content of the issue ad, however, is the funding source for the ad and the possible reasons this group is running it in favor of Rep. Garthwaite.

The Greater Wisconsin Committee is funded in large part by the trial lawyers lobby. Now why would the trial lawyers want thousands of dollars to be spent helping Rep. Garthwaite? Could it be because he was a deciding vote to save their auto-insurance mandate in the budget, the mandate that will cost you an extra $300 in premiums and will make them millions in lawsuit payouts?

Shady Third Party Comes to Phil's Rescue

I got a call from a friend today telling me to turn on the radio. When I turned it on, guess what I heard? I heard a shadowy third party group telling me to call Rep. Gathwaite and urge him to vote for the state budget. The group was none other than the most despicable of all the groups that have been hijacking our Democratic process – the Greater Wisconsin Committee.

According to the left-leaning Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, the Greater Wisconsin Committee is:

A Milwaukee-based phony issue ad group that was organized in 2004 to support Democratic candidates for statewide office and the legislature. Like other phony issue ad groups, it has consistently refused to disclose how much it raises and spends to sponsor mostly negative mailings and broadcast advertising during an election. Much of its cash has come from labor unions and Democratic-leaning ideological groups that get most of their money from large corporations.

Madison insiders have reported in the past that the Greater Wisconsin Committee also gets much of its funding from two other sources: tribal casino interests, which seek political clout to protect their state sponsored casino monopoly and trial lawyers who seek laws that make it easier to sue you and I for big paydays.

Now why would a shady political attack unit that works for public employee unions, trial lawyers, and Indian tribes be spending cash to support Rep. Gathwaite and the Democrat budget? Nobody can be sure but here are a few guesses:

- $3 billion in state tax increases.
- $1.3 billion property tax hike.
- Payback for the trial lawyers that will make Wisconsin the worst state for lawsuits in the country.
- Far left policy such as $15 million worth of free state health care and benefits for the boyfriends and girlfriends of state employees.
- Far left policy such as a new drivers license program and instate tuition for illegal immigrants.

The fact is that the groups who fund and run the Greater Wisconsin Committee have just as much to gain from this budget passing as we citizens have to lose. The question is, when the budget comes up for a vote Wednesday, will Rep. Garthwaite stand with his constituents or with the shady group that runs his shadow campaign and is now running radio ads for him?